Participants’ impact out-of peers’ similarity off attitudes towards homosexuals try reviewed playing with a couple the same facts, but for the peers’ sex

All the questions read: “Circle the quantity you to definitely finest makes reference to how almost certainly your own feelings on homosexuals resembles this new ideas your primary [ male / female ] nearest and dearest have toward homosexuals.” Both concerns were replied having fun with a beneficial 5-point measure between 0 (Next to nothing) so you’re able to cuatro (A lot). Early in the day research has receive these materials so you’re able to reflect respondents’ normative armenian dating etiquette thinking toward homosexual anyone (Herek & Capitanio, 1996). These items demonstrated an effective Cronbach’s ? out-of .70.

Religiosity

We counted religiosity playing with four activities: (a) importance of religious or religious philosophy; (b) regularity regarding church or temple attendance in the past season; (c) frequency to help you occurrences paid by the their religious group in past times year; and you may (d) prayer volume in earlier times week. Need for spiritual opinions is counted playing with an excellent cuatro-point size ranging from step one (Perhaps not essential whatsoever) so you can 4 (Important). The thing computing participants’ attendance so you’re able to a chapel or temple when you look at the the past season see, “How many times perhaps you have went to a church or temple regarding earlier in the day year?” People answered so it by going for among the adopting the half a dozen groups: Never ever, Several times a-year, Once or twice per year, From time to time a month, Weekly, and more than weekly. This new half a dozen answer classes having chapel attendance have been plus utilized for attendance to help you sponsored spiritual occurrences. Prayer regularity is examined having six groups: Never ever, From time to time 30 days, A few times 1 month, One or two moments each week, Once a day, or maybe more than daily. Most other studies have made use of comparable methods away from religiosity in their forms and found these to become constantly reliable (Herek & Gonzalez-Rivera, inside push). Religiosity issues had a Cronbach’s ? away from .80 in our study.

Thinking into Lesbians and you will Gays

The final section of the survey integrated the latest Spanish-translation of totally new brand of new Thinking Toward Lesbians and you will Gay (ATLG) Level (Herek, 1984). Which 20-items scale was replied using an excellent 5-section size anywhere between step one (Firmly disagree) so you’re able to 5 (Strongly consent). Respondents’ get is computed by firmly taking the suggest across the points for example one large results echo more bad attitudes on the gay guys and you may girls. With its new variation, the scale shall be split into a few ten-items subscales: the latest Thinking on Lesbians (ATL) as well as the Attitudes with the Gays (ATG) subscales. We interpreted the new ATLG scale towards Foreign-language-words and right back interpreted of Language into English to be sure equivalency between them models. Spanish-talking Puerto Rican visitors, who volunteered when you look at the a good pre-try pilot study, experienced the usage language compatible. Foreign language and you may English models of the items’ articles exists for the Appendix An effective.

Exploratory principle axis basis analyses that have oblique rotation of the Language types of the fresh ATLG Scale got three circumstances: an effective Condemnation-Threshold Grounds (17 items; %), a home-Expressive Basis (you to goods; six.75%), and you can a principles Factor (one or two affairs; 6.51%). These around three section told me 60.9% of complete variance. New explained variance of these situations try nearly the same as those acquired for the Herek’s (1984) original investigation. Following Herek’s (1984) testimonial, i chosen the items packing high just toward role matrix of one’s Condemnation-Endurance factor. After deleting 3 situations (circumstances dos, eight, 12), we chose to and additionally clean out an extra goods (item 17) as it diminished the scale’s accuracy significantly. The ATLG measure finished having 16-circumstances and told me 55% of your own complete difference. The object loadings for three things are demonstrated inside the Table step one .

Dining table step 1

Herek’s ATLG Scale might have been administered in numerous racial teams while in the the united states having uniform Cronbach’s alpha coefficients higher than .87 (Herek, 2000). Due to the fact level got never been employed for a great Puerto Rican sample, the ATLG-Foreign language adaptation displayed accuracy results (?=.93) exactly like men and women obtained of the Herek from inside the an undergraduate test (Herek, 1996). To lessen the newest rising cost of living of your Cronbach’s leader accuracy coefficient due to your level of items, we parceled this new sixteen products on the five element score. For each rating represented this new imply worthy of for each and every five-product ATL and you may ATG sign, correspondingly. Alternative placement of facts from the its review bought basis loadings was basically regularly through the indicators toward ATG and you can ATL symptoms, respectively. All four-product indications got a .ninety Cronbach’s leader coefficient.